Strategic choices to reduce implantable cardioverter-defibrillator-related morbidity
- 20 April 2010
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Nature Reviews Cardiology
- Vol. 7 (7), 376-383
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2010.50
Abstract
The number of patients undergoing implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is increasing, as the indications for device therapy have broadened. Despite the mortality benefits associated with ICDs, they can also cause substantial complications. Drs. Wazni and Wilkoff explore the issues involved in managing patients with an ICD and discuss approaches for reducing these adverse effects, from prevention of infection, and the choice of lead and implantation technique, to strategies for programming and monitoring the device. The indications for ICD implantation continue to expand; however, these devices are associated with complications related to the implantation procedure itself and morbidity caused by the normal and abnormal functioning of the components comprising the system. Several factors need to be considered when embarking on initiating ICD implantation. Special consideration should be given to implantation technique and choice of operator to decrease acute complications. After implantation, the device should be appropriately programmed to minimize unnecessary pacing and decrease the likelihood of inappropriate shocks. Therapy should, in most cases, be painless and can be achieved by adhering to simple programming recommendations. A well-established and efficient follow-up program, ideally incorporating remote monitoring, is very important to ensure compliance and to monitor therapy and the integrity of the various device components—particularly given the possibility of device or lead malfunction.Keywords
This publication has 87 references indexed in Scilit:
- Remote monitoring and follow-up of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillatorsEP Europace, 2009
- Association of Physician Certification and Outcomes Among Patients Receiving an Implantable Cardioverter-DefibrillatorJAMA, 2009
- Patient and Implanting Physician Factors Associated With Mortality and Complications After Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation, 2002–2005Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 2008
- Prognostic Importance of Defibrillator Shocks in Patients with Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Morphology discrimination in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: consistency of template match percentage during atrial tachyarrhythmias at different heart ratesEP Europace, 2008
- Prevention of inappropriate therapy in implantable defibrillators: A meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing single-chamber and dual-chamber arrhythmia discrimination algorithmsInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2008
- Sensing Failure Associated with the Medtronic Sprint Fidelis Defibrillator LeadJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2007
- Evaluation of morphology discrimination for ventricular tachycardia diagnosis in implantable cardioverter-defibrillatorsHeart Rhythm, 2006
- Frequency and Causes of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapies: Is Device Therapy Proarrhythmic?The American Journal of Cardiology, 2006
- Relation of Advanced Heart Failure Symptoms to Risk of Inappropriate Defibrillator ShocksThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2006