Frequency and Causes of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapies: Is Device Therapy Proarrhythmic?
- 15 April 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 97 (8), 1255-1261
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.11.048
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Potential proarrhythmic effect of biventricular pacing: Fact or myth?Heart Rhythm, 2005
- Effect of statin therapy on risk of ventricular arrhythmia among patients with coronary artery disease and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillatorThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2005
- Prevalence and Management of Inappropriate Detection and Therapies in Patients with First-Generation Biventricular Pacemaker-DefibrillatorsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2005
- Prophylactic Implantation of a Defibrillator in Patients with Myocardial Infarction and Reduced Ejection FractionThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Biventricular pacing diminishes the need for implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000
- A Randomized Study of the Prevention of Sudden Death in Patients with Coronary Artery DiseaseThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Prophylactic Use of Implanted Cardiac Defibrillators in Patients at High Risk for Ventricular Arrhythmias after Coronary-Artery Bypass Graft SurgeryThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Comparison of frequency of aggravation of ventricular tachyarrhythmias after implantation of automatic defibrillators using epicardial versus nonthoracotomy lead systemsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
- Effect of site of pacing on dispersion of refractorinessThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1985
- Clinical classification of cardiac deaths.Circulation, 1982