Don't spin the pen: two alternative methods for second-stage sampling in urban cluster surveys
Open Access
- 1 June 2007
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Emerging Themes in Epidemiology
- Vol. 4 (1), 8
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-4-8
Abstract
In two-stage cluster surveys, the traditional method used in second-stage sampling (in which the first household in a cluster is selected) is time-consuming and may result in biased estimates of the indicator of interest. Firstly, a random direction from the center of the cluster is selected, usually by spinning a pen. The houses along that direction are then counted out to the boundary of the cluster, and one is then selected at random to be the first household surveyed. This process favors households towards the center of the cluster, but it could easily be improved. During a recent meningitis vaccination coverage survey in Maradi, Niger, we compared this method of first household selection to two alternatives in urban zones: 1) using a superimposed grid on the map of the cluster area and randomly selecting an intersection; and 2) drawing the perimeter of the cluster area using a Global Positioning System (GPS) and randomly selecting one point within the perimeter. Although we only compared a limited number of clusters using each method, we found the sampling grid method to be the fastest and easiest for field survey teams, although it does require a map of the area. Selecting a random GPS point was also found to be a good method, once adequate training can be provided. Spinning the pen and counting households to the boundary was the most complicated and time-consuming. The two methods tested here represent simpler, quicker and potentially more robust alternatives to spinning the pen for cluster surveys in urban areas. However, in rural areas, these alternatives would favor initial household selection from lower density (or even potentially empty) areas. Bearing in mind these limitations, as well as available resources and feasibility, investigators should choose the most appropriate method for their particular survey context.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of cluster and systematic sampling methods for measuring crude mortalityBulletin of the World Health Organization, 2006
- Optimization of household survey sampling without sample framesInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2006
- Mortality and Malnutrition Among Populations Living in South Darfur, SudanJAMA, 2005
- Comparison of two cluster sampling methods for health surveys in developing countriesInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2004
- The Application of Geographic Information Systems and Global Positioning Systems in Humanitarian Emergencies: Lessons Learned, Programme Implications and Future ResearchDisasters, 2003
- kinshasa Little relief for eastern Democratic Republic of CongoThe Lancet, 2001
- A Not Quite as Quick but Much Cleaner Alternative to the Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) Cluster Survey DesignInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1996
- A Computer Simulation of Household Sampling Schemes for Health Surveys in Developing CountriesInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1994
- Increasing the accuracy of the expanded programme on immunization's cluster survey designAnnals of Epidemiology, 1994
- Assessment of vaccination coverage, vaccination scar rates, and smallpox scarring in five areas of West Africa.1973