Inside the Hybrid Organization: Selective Coupling as a Response to Competing Institutional Logics
- 1 August 2013
- journal article
- Published by Academy of Management in The Academy of Management Journal
- Vol. 56 (4), 972-1001
- https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0405
Abstract
This article explores how hybrid organizations, which incorporate competing institutional logics, internally manage the logics that they embody. Relying on an inductive comparative case study of four work integration social enterprises embedded in competing social welfare and commercial logics, we show that, instead of adopting strategies of decoupling or compromising, as the literature typically suggests, these organizations selectively coupled intact elements prescribed by each logic. This strategy allowed them to project legitimacy to external stakeholders without having to engage in costly deceptions or negotiations. We further identify a specific hybridization pattern that we refer to as “Trojan horse,” whereby organizations that entered the work integration field with low legitimacy because of their embeddedness in the commercial logic strategically incorporated elements from the social welfare logic in an attempt to gain legitimacy and acceptance. Surprisingly, they did so more than comparable organizations originating from the social welfare logic. These findings suggest that, when lacking legitimacy in a given field, hybrids may manipulate the templates provided by the multiple logics in which they are embedded in an attempt to gain acceptance. Overall, our findings contribute to a better understanding of how organizations can survive and thrive when embedded in pluralistic institutional environments.Keywords
This publication has 62 references indexed in Scilit:
- Navigating Paradox as a Mechanism of Change and Innovation in Hybrid OrganizationsThe Academy of Management Journal, 2013
- Arriving at the Starting Line: The Impact of Community and Financial Logics on New Banking VenturesThe Academy of Management Journal, 2012
- Faking It or Muddling Through? Understanding Decoupling in Response to Stakeholder PressuresThe Academy of Management Journal, 2012
- Which Iron Cage? Endo- and exoisomorphism in Corporate Venture Capital ProgramsThe Academy of Management Journal, 2012
- A Tale of Two Cities: Competing Logics and Practice Variation in the Professionalizing of Mutual FundsThe Academy of Management Journal, 2007
- The legitimacy of strategic alliances: an institutional perspectiveStrategic Management Journal, 2006
- Crafting Legitimation Projects: An Institutional Analysis of Private Education BusinessesSociological Forum, 2006
- From the Critics’ Corner: Logic Blending, Discursive Change and Authenticity in a Cultural Production System*Journal of Management Studies, 2005
- The Coupling of the Symbolic and the Technical in an Institutionalized Context: The Negotiated Order of the GAO's Audit Reporting ProcessAmerican Sociological Review, 1999
- Theory and Method in Comparative Research: Two StrategiesSocial Forces, 1983