Minimizing amplification bias during reverse transcription for in vitro selections
Open Access
- 16 May 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in RNA
- Vol. 29 (8), 1301-1315
- https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.079650.123
Abstract
Systematic Evolution of Ligands through EXponential enrichment (SELEX) is widely used to identify functional nucleic acids, such as aptamers and ribozymes. Ideally, selective pressure drives enrichment of sequences that display the function of interest (binding, catalysis, etc). However, amplification biases from reverse transcription can overwhelm this enrichment and leave some functional sequences at a disadvantage, with cumulative effects across multiple rounds of selection. Libraries that are designed to include structural scaffolds can improve selection outcomes by sampling sequence space more strategically, but they are also susceptible to such amplification biases, particularly during reverse transcription. Therefore, we tested five reverse transcriptases (RTs) – ImProm-II, Marathon RT (MaRT), TGIRT-III, SuperScript IV (SSIV), and BST 3.0 DNA polymerase (BST) – to determine which enzymes introduced the least bias. We directly compared cDNA yield and processivity for these enzymes on RNA templates with varying degrees of structure under various reaction conditions. In these analyses, BST exhibited excellent processivity, generated large quantities of full length cDNA product, displayed little bias among templates with varying structure and sequence, and performed well on long, highly structured viral RNAs. Additionally, six RNA libraries containing either strong, moderate, or no incorporated structural elements were pooled and competed head-to-head in six rounds of an amplification-only selection without external selective pressure using either SSIV, ImProm-II, or BST during reverse transcription. High-throughput sequencing established that BST maintained the most neutral enrichment values, indicating low inter-library bias over the course of six rounds, relative to SSIV and ImProm-II, and it introduced minimal mutational bias.Keywords
Funding Information
- NASA Exobiology (NNX17AE88G)
- NASA Interdisciplinary Consortium for Astrobiology Research “Bringing RNA to Life” (80NSSC21K0596)
- Ryan Foundation
This publication has 62 references indexed in Scilit:
- High-throughput sequence analysis reveals structural diversity and improved potency among RNA inhibitors of HIV reverse transcriptaseNucleic Acids Research, 2012
- Nucleotide Bias Observed with a Short SELEX RNA Aptamer LibraryNucleic Acid Therapeutics, 2011
- RNA diagnostics: real‐time RT‐PCR strategies and promising novel target RNAsWIREs RNA, 2010
- Computational approaches toward the design of pools for the in vitro selection of complex aptamersRNA, 2010
- Selection of Aptamers for Amyloid β-Protein, the Causative Agent of Alzheimer's DiseaseJournal of Visualized Experiments, 2010
- Rational optimization of the DSL ligase ribozyme with GNRA/receptor interacting modulesArchives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 2009
- In silico selection of RNA aptamersNucleic Acids Research, 2009
- A computational proposal for designing structured RNA pools for in vitro selection of RNAsRNA, 2007
- In vitro selection of RNA molecules that bind specific ligandsNature, 1990
- Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential Enrichment: RNA Ligands to Bacteriophage T4 DNA PolymeraseScience, 1990