Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Some Improvements after 10 Years of STARD
- 1 March 2015
- journal article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 274 (3), 781-789
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14141160
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARDBMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 2013
- A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studiesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2013
- Reporting the Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests: The STARD Initiative 10 Years OnClinical Chemistry, 2013
- QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy StudiesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2011
- There is nothing staid about STARDNeurology, 2006
- The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statementNeurology, 2006
- Quality of Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy StudiesRadiology, 2005
- The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and ElaborationClinical Chemistry, 2003
- Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD InitiativeRadiology, 2003
- Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic TestsJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 1999