11 Evidence in Management and Organizational Science: Assembling the Field’s Full Weight of Scientific Knowledge Through Syntheses
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- Published by Academy of Management in Academy of Management Annals
- Vol. 2 (1), 475-515
- https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520802211651
Abstract
This chapter advocates the good scientific practice of systematic research syntheses in Management and Organizational Science (MOS). A research synthesis is the systematic accumulation, analysis and reflective interpretation of the full body of relevant empirical evidence related to a question. It is the critical first step in effective use of scientific evidence. Synthesis is not a conventional literature review. Literature reviews are often position papers, cherry‐picking studies to advocate a point of view. Instead, syntheses systematically identify where research findings are clear (and where they aren’t), a key first step to establishing the conclusions science supports. Syntheses are also important for identifying contested findings and productive lines for future research. Uses of MOS evidence, that is, the motives for undertaking a research synthesis include scientific discovery and explanation, improved management practice guidelines, and formulating public policy. We identify six criteria for establishing the evidentiary value of a body of primary studies in MOS. We then pinpoint the stumbling blocks currently keeping the field from making effective use of its ever‐expanding base of empirical studies. Finally, this chapter outlines (a) an approach to research synthesis suitable to the domain of MOS; and (b) supporting practices to make synthesis a collective MOS project.Keywords
This publication has 87 references indexed in Scilit:
- A multitude of syntheses: a comparison of five approaches from diverse policy fieldsEvidence & Policy, 2006
- Full-Cycle Micro-Organizational Behavior ResearchOrganization Science, 2005
- Evidence‐based practice in educational research: a critical realist critique of systematic reviewBritish Journal of Sociology of Education, 2005
- Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes careSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 2003
- FINANCIAL CONSEQUENCES OF EMPLOYMENT-CHANGE DECISIONS IN MAJOR U.S. CORPORATIONS.The Academy of Management Journal, 1997
- Design and Devotion: Surges of Rational and Normative Ideologies of Control in Managerial DiscourseAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1992
- Product Quality and Pay Equity Between Lower-Level Employees and Top Management: An Investigation of Distributive Justice TheoryAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1992
- Saving the PhenomenaThe Philosophical Review, 1988
- In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 1979
- Selective Perception: A Note on the Departmental Identifications of ExecutivesSociometry, 1958