Evaluation of an Intervention to Increase Screening Colonoscopy in an Urban Public Hospital Setting
Open Access
- 25 March 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Journal of Urban Health
- Vol. 83 (2), 231-243
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-006-9029-6
Abstract
Only 50% of New Yorkers aged 50 and over reported ever being screened for colorectal cancer by any modality according to a recent household survey. The objective of this investigation was to assess the impact of a hospital-based intervention aimed at eliminating health care system barriers to timely colorectal cancer screening at Lincoln Medical Center, a large, urban public hospital in one of the nation's poorest census tracts. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all colonoscopies performed over an 11-month period, during which a multi-pronged intervention to increase the number of screening colonoscopies took place. Two "patient navigators" were hired during the study period to provide continuity for colonoscopy patients. A Direct Endoscopic Referral System (DERS) was also implemented. Enhancements to the gastrointestinal (GI) suite were also made to improve operational efficiency. Immediately following the introduction of the patient navigators, there was a dramatic and sustained decline in the broken appointment rates for both screening and diagnostic colonoscopy (from 67% in May of 2003 to 5% in June of 2003). The likelihood of keeping the appointment for colonoscopy after the patient navigator intervention increased by nearly 3-fold (relative risk = 2.6, 95% CI 2.2-3.0). The rate of screening colonoscopies increased from 56.8 per month to 119 per month. The screening colonoscopy coverage provided by this facility among persons aged 50 and over in surrounding Zip codes increased from 5.2 to 15.6% (RR 3.0, 95% CI 1.9-4.7). Efforts to increase the number of screening colonoscopies were highly successful, due in large part to the influence of patient navigators, a streamlined referral system, and GI suite enhancements. These findings suggest that there are significant health-care system barriers to colonoscopy that, when addressed, could have a significant impact on screening colonoscopy rates in the general population.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Colon cancer screening practices in New York City, 2003Cancer, 2005
- Racial/ethnic differences in screening for colon cancer: report from the New York Cancer Project.2005
- Examination of population-wide trends in barriers to cancer screening from a diffusion of innovation perspective (1987–2000)Preventive Medicine, 2004
- Invited commentary: places, people, and health.American Journal of Epidemiology, 2002
- Progress in Cancer Screening Over a Decade: Results of Cancer Screening From the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview SurveysJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2001
- Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Adolescent Women's Sexual and Reproductive Behavior: The Case of Five Developed CountriesFamily Planning Perspectives, 2001
- Neighborhood of Residence and Incidence of Coronary Heart DiseaseThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- The Social Environment and Health: A Discussion of the Epidemiologic LiteratureAnnual Review of Public Health, 1999
- Neighborhood risk factors for low birthweight in Baltimore: a multilevel analysis.American Journal of Public Health, 1997
- American Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: update 1997. American Cancer Society Detection and Treatment Advisory Group on Colorectal CancerCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1997