TBI risk stratification at presentation
- 1 August 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
- Vol. 73 (2), S122-S127
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0b013e3182606327
Abstract
BACKGROUND We have created a theoretical algorithm for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after traumatic brain injury (TBI) known as the Parkland Protocol, which stratifies patients into low-, medium-, and high-risk categories for spontaneous progression of hemorrhage. This prospective study characterizes the incidence and timing of radiographic progression of the TBI patterns in these categories. METHODS Inclusion criterion was presentation with intracranial blood between February 2010 and March 2011; exclusion was receipt of only one computed tomographic scan of the head during the inpatient stay or preinjury warfarin. At admission, all patients were preliminarily categorized per the Parkland Protocol as follows: low risk (LR), patients meeting the modified Berne-Norwood criteria; moderate risk (MR), injuries larger than the modified Berne-Norwood criteria without requiring a neurosurgical procedure; high risk (HR), any patient with a craniotomy/monitor. RESULTS A total of 245 patients with intracranial hemorrhage were enrolled during the 13-month study period. Of patients preliminarily classified as LR at admission (n = 136), progression was seen in 25.0%. Spontaneous worsening was seen in 7.4% of LR patients at 24 hours after injury, and no LR patients progressed at 72 hours after injury. In patients initially classified as MR at admission (n = 42), progression was seen in 42.9%, with 91.5% of patients demonstrating stable computed tomographic head scans at 72 hours after injury. In patients initially classified as HR (n = 67), 64.2% demonstrated spontaneous progression of their TBI patterns, with 10.5% continuing to progress at 72 hours after injury. Most repeat scans were performed as routinely scheduled studies (81–91%). CONCLUSION Increases in the incidence of spontaneous worsening were seen as severities of injury progressed from the Parkland Protocol’s LR to MR to HR arms. The time frames for these spontaneous worsenings seem to be such that the protocol’s theoretical recommendations for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis are worth pursuing as future points of investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic study, level III.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Safety and Efficacy of Heparin or Enoxaparin Prophylaxis in Blunt Trauma Patients With a Head Abbreviated Injury Severity Score >2The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2011
- Interrupted Pharmocologic Thromboprophylaxis Increases Venous Thromboembolism in Traumatic Brain InjuryThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2011
- Early Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis With Enoxaparin in Patients With Blunt Traumatic Brain InjuryThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2008
- V. Deep Vein Thrombosis ProphylaxisJournal of Neurotrauma, 2007
- Utility of Once‐Daily Dose of Low‐Molecular‐Weight Heparin to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism in Multisystem Trauma PatientsWorld Journal of Surgery, 2006
- Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis after Head and Spinal Trauma: Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices Versus Low Molecular Weight HeparinWorld Journal of Surgery, 2004
- Prospective Evaluation of the Safety of Enoxaparin Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Intracranial Hemorrhagic InjuriesArchives of Surgery, 2002
- A potentially expanded role for enoxaparin in preventing venous thromboembolism in high risk blunt trauma patientsJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2001
- The risk assessment profile score identifies trauma patients at risk for deep vein thrombosisSurgery, 2000
- A Comparison of Low-Dose Heparin with Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin as Prophylaxis against Venous Thromboembolism after Major TraumaThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1996