Nurse staffing levels revisited: a consideration of key issues in nurse staffing levels and skill mix research
- 1 September 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Nursing Management
- Vol. 17 (6), 759-766
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.01023.x
Abstract
This paper revisits the published evidence relating to how nurse staffing levels impact on patient, nurse and service outcomes and considers the implications of this body of research for nurse managers in their quest to determine optimum nursing numbers.Within the context of the recognized global nursing shortage and particular local pressures within international health services, questions of appropriate nurse staffing levels and skill mix are once again becoming increasingly important. It would seem that the determination of optimum nurse staffing levels and skill mix is a central issue in relation to health service governance, service user involvement, as well as in the recruitment, retention and well-being of nursing staff across the service sectors.A review of published evidence was carried out, applying key principles of the systematic method, in order to facilitate the identification of current factors and issues in nurse staffing levels research. The review did not seek to address a specific research question. The search covered 10 years from 1998 to 2008 and identified more than 500 relevant papers, giving a wide international perspective.The majority of research in the field relates to the acute service sector and there are considerable similarities in issues that transcend international boundaries. Much of the research focuses on the impact on patients and nurses of 'poor' nurse staffing levels. More recent studies have explored the impact of nurse staffing levels on the service organization itself. However, while there may be an association between models of nurse staffing and outcomes, there is insufficient evidence to establish a causal relationship between these factors. In this context it is perhaps time to reconsider how nursing outcomes are defined and measured. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT AND CONCLUSION: Nurse managers, commissioners of services and workforce planners need to be cognisant of key issues and analyses in the consideration of nurse staffing levels. Not least of these is the need for a healthy degree of caution regarding the supposed objectivity, scientific basis, or evidence base, for rational calculation of optimum nurse staffing levels.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adverse nurse outcomes: correlation to nurses' workload, staffing, and shift rotation in Kuwaiti hospitalsApplied Nursing Research, 2008
- Effects of Hospital Care Environment on Patient Mortality and Nurse OutcomesJona: the Journal of Nursing Administration, 2008
- Aiding and Abetting — Nursing Crises at Home and AbroadNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Impact of California’s Licensed Nurse-Patient Ratios on Unit-Level Nurse Staffing and Patient OutcomesPolicy, politics & nursing practice, 2005
- Relationship between quality of care, staffing levels, skill mix and nurse autonomy: literature reviewJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2005
- Role stress in nurses: Review of related factors and strategies for moving forwardNursing & Health Sciences, 2005
- Health correlates of autonomy, control and professional relationships in the nursing work environmentJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2003
- Hospital Nurse Staffing and Patient Mortality, Nurse Burnout, and Job DissatisfactionJAMA, 2002
- Global nursing shortagesBMJ, 2002
- Determining nurse staffing levels: a critical review of the literatureJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1994