Inter Subject Variability and Reproducibility of Diffusion Tensor Imaging within and between Different Imaging Sessions
Open Access
- 28 June 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 8 (6), e65941
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065941
Abstract
The aim of these studies was to provide reference data on intersubject variability and reproducibility of diffusion tensor imaging. Healthy volunteers underwent imaging on two occasions using the same 3T Siemens Verio magnetic resonance scanner. At each session two identical diffusion tensor sequences were obtained along with standard structural imaging. Fractional anisotropy, apparent diffusion coefficient, axial and radial diffusivity maps were created and regions of interest applied in normalised space. The baseline data from all 26 volunteers were used to calculate the intersubject variability, while within session and between session reproducibility were calculated from all the available data. The reproducibility of measurements were used to calculate the overall and within session 95% prediction interval for zero change. The within and between session reproducibility data were lower than the values for intersubject variability, and were different across the brain. The regional mean (range) coefficient of variation figures for within session reproducibility were 2.1 (0.9–5.5%), 1.2 (0.4–3.9%), 1.2 (0.4–3.8%) and 1.8 (0.4–4.3%) for fractional anisotropy, apparent diffusion coefficient, axial and radial diffusivity, and were lower than between session reproducibility measurements (2.4 (1.1–5.9%), 1.9 (0.7–5.7%), 1.7 (0.7–4.7%) and 2.4 (0.9–5.8%); p<0.001). The calculated overall and within session 95% prediction intervals for zero change were similar. This study provides additional reference data concerning intersubject variability and reproducibility of diffusion tensor imaging conducted within the same imaging session and different imaging sessions. These data can be utilised in interventional studies to quantify change within a single imaging session, or to assess the significance of change in longitudinal studies of brain injury and disease.This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Different Patterns of White Matter Degeneration Using Multiple Diffusion Indices and Volumetric Data in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer PatientsPLOS ONE, 2012
- Biomarkers of increased diffusion anisotropy in semi-acute mild traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal perspectiveBrain, 2012
- Quantification of accuracy and precision of multi-center DTI measurements: A diffusion phantom and human brain studyNeuroImage, 2011
- Mapping Traumatic Axonal Injury Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Correlations with Functional OutcomePLOS ONE, 2011
- Parcellating the neuroanatomical basis of impaired decision-making in traumatic brain injuryBrain, 2011
- White Matter Changes and Word Finding Failures with Increasing AgePLOS ONE, 2011
- Identical, but not the same: Intra-site and inter-site reproducibility of fractional anisotropy measures on two 3.0T scannersNeuroImage, 2010
- Reliability of fiber tracking measurements in diffusion tensor imaging for longitudinal studyNeuroImage, 2010
- Effects of signal‐to‐noise ratio on the accuracy and reproducibility of diffusion tensor imaging–derived fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and principal eigenvector measurements at 1.5TJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2007
- Reproducibility of quantitative tractography methods applied to cerebral white matterNeuroImage, 2007