A machine learning approach to the accurate prediction of multi-leaf collimator positional errors
- 7 March 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by IOP Publishing in Physics in Medicine & Biology
- Vol. 61 (6), 2514-2531
- https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/61/6/2514
Abstract
Discrepancies between planned and delivered movements of multi-leaf collimators (MLCs) are an important source of errors in dose distributions during radiotherapy. In this work we used machine learning techniques to train models to predict these discrepancies, assessed the accuracy of the model predictions, and examined the impact these errors have on quality assurance (QA) procedures and dosimetry. Predictive leaf motion parameters for the models were calculated from the plan files, such as leaf position and velocity, whether the leaf was moving towards or away from the isocenter of the MLC, and many others. Differences in positions between synchronized DICOM-RT planning files and DynaLog files reported during QA delivery were used as a target response for training of the models. The final model is capable of predicting MLC positions during delivery to a high degree of accuracy. For moving MLC leaves, predicted positions were shown to be significantly closer to delivered positions than were planned positions. By incorporating predicted positions into dose calculations in the TPS, increases were shown in gamma passing rates against measured dose distributions recorded during QA delivery. For instance, head and neck plans with 1%/2 mm gamma criteria had an average increase in passing rate of 4.17% (SD = 1.54%). This indicates that the inclusion of predictions during dose calculation leads to a more realistic representation of plan delivery. To assess impact on the patient, dose volumetric histograms (DVH) using delivered positions were calculated for comparison with planned and predicted DVHs. In all cases, predicted dose volumetric parameters were in closer agreement to the delivered parameters than were the planned parameters, particularly for organs at risk on the periphery of the treatment area. By incorporating the predicted positions into the TPS, the treatment planner is given a more realistic view of the dose distribution as it will truly be delivered to the patient.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- A multi-institution evaluation of MLC log files and performance in IMRT deliveryRadiation Oncology, 2014
- Effect of MLC leaf position, collimator rotation angle, and gantry rotation angle errors on intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans for nasopharyngeal carcinomaMedical Dosimetry, 2013
- On the sensitivity of common gamma‐index evaluation methods to MLC misalignments in Rapidarc quality assuranceMedical Physics, 2013
- Applied Predictive ModelingPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2013
- Impact of leaf motion constraints on IMAT plan quality, deliver accuracy, and efficiencyMedical Physics, 2011
- Quality assurance methodology for Varian RapidArc treatment plansJournal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 2010
- Task Group 142 report: Quality assurance of medical acceleratorsa)Medical Physics, 2009
- Random ForestsMachine Learning, 2001
- AAPM's TG‐51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high‐energy photon and electron beamsMedical Physics, 1999
- Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: Report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40Medical Physics, 1994