On the relation between working memory capacity and the antisaccade task.
- 1 October 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Vol. 48 (10), 1420-1447
- https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001060
Abstract
Eight experiments (N = 2,003) assessed the relation between working memory capacity (WMC) and performance on the antisaccade task. Experiments 1-5 and 7 examined individual differences in aspects of goal management processes occurring during the preparatory delay of the antisaccade task. WMC tended to interact with delay interval suggesting that high WMC individuals better prepared for the upcoming trial by activating the task goal to a higher level than low WMC individuals (although these effects were generally small). Experiments 3a, 4, and 7 further demonstrated that individual differences in the consistency of attention (i.e., lapses of attention) were partially important for the relation between WMC and antisaccade performance. Experiment 5 demonstrated that knowledge of the likelihood of target location increased overall performance, but did not interact with WMC. Experiment 6 manipulated stimulus onset asynchrony and suggested that speed factors are also likely important for the relation between WMC and antisaccade performance. Finally, structural equation models in Experiment 7 suggested that lapses of attention and speed factors partially accounted for the relation between WMC and antisaccade, but WMC still accounted for unique variance in antisaccade. Collectively, the results suggest that multiple factors (goal activation, consistency of attention, and speed factors) contribute to the relation between variation in WMC and performance on the antisaccade task.This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- What is working memory capacity, and how can we measure it?Frontiers in Psychology, 2013
- Drifting from slow to “d'oh!”: Working memory capacity and mind wandering predict extreme reaction times and executive control errors.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2012
- Why does working memory capacity predict variation in reading comprehension? On the influence of mind wandering and executive attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2012
- Consider the context: Blocked versus interleaved presentation of antisaccade trialsPsychophysiology, 2009
- Anatomy of an error: A bidirectional state model of task engagement/disengagement and attention-related errorsCognition, 2009
- Why are reasoning ability and working memory capacity related to mental speed? An investigation of stimulus–response compatibility in choice reaction time tasksThe European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2006
- Neural Processes Associated With Antisaccade Task Performance Investigated With Event-Related fMRIJournal of Neurophysiology, 2005
- Preparation for Speeded Action as a Psychophysiological Concept.Psychological Bulletin, 2005
- Look away: the anti-saccade task and the voluntary control of eye movementNature Reviews Neuroscience, 2004
- Inhibitory inefficiency and failures of intention activation: Age-related decline in the control of saccadic eye movements.Psychology and Aging, 2000