Drifting from slow to “d'oh!”: Working memory capacity and mind wandering predict extreme reaction times and executive control errors.
Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2012
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Vol. 38 (3), 525-549
- https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025896
Abstract
A combined experimental, individual-differences, and thought-sampling study tested the predictions of executive attention (e.g., Engle & Kane, 2004) and coordinative binding (e.g., Oberauer, Süβ, Wilhelm, & Sander, 2007) theories of working memory capacity (WMC). We assessed 288 subjects' WMC and their performance and mind-wandering rates during a sustained-attention task; subjects completed either a go/no-go version requiring executive control over habit or a vigilance version that did not. We further combined the data with those from McVay and Kane (2009) to (1) gauge the contributions of WMC and attentional lapses to the worst performance rule and the tail, or τ parameter, of reaction time (RT) distributions; (2) assess which parameters from a quantitative evidence-accumulation RT model were predicted by WMC and mind-wandering reports; and (3) consider intrasubject RT patterns--particularly, speeding--as potential objective markers of mind wandering. We found that WMC predicted action and thought control in only some conditions, that attentional lapses (indicated by task-unrelated-thought reports and drift-rate variability in evidence accumulation) contributed to τ, performance accuracy, and WMC's association with them and that mind-wandering experiences were not predicted by trial-to-trial RT changes, and so they cannot always be inferred from objective performance measures.Funding Information
- National Institutes of Mental Health (F31MH081344)
This publication has 84 references indexed in Scilit:
- Goal Neglect and Working Memory Capacity in 4‐ to 6‐Year‐Old ChildrenChild Development, 2010
- Eye Movements During Mindless ReadingPsychological Science, 2010
- Individual differences in conflict-monitoring: testing means and covariance hypothesis about the Simon and the Eriksen Flanker taskPsychological Research, 2008
- Individual differences in working memory capacity and divided attention in dichotic listeningPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2007
- Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2007
- Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guidePsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2005
- A Comparison of Sequential Sampling Models for Two-Choice Reaction Time.Psychological Review, 2004
- The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable AnalysisCognitive Psychology, 2000
- Stimulus-independent thought depends on central executive resourcesMemory & Cognition, 1995
- Task-unrelated thought frequency as a function of age: A laboratory study.Psychology and Aging, 1989