Learning curves of microdissection testicular sperm extraction for nonobstructive azoospermia
- 31 August 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Fertility and Sterility
- Vol. 94 (3), 1008-1011
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.108
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- High serum FSH levels in men with nonobstructive azoospermia does not affect success of microdissection testicular sperm extractionFertility and Sterility, 2009
- Structural and functional changes to the testis after conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extractionUrology, 2005
- Conventional multiple or microdissection testicular sperm extraction: a comparative studyHuman Reproduction, 2002
- Conventional Versus Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction for Nonobstructive AzoospermiaJournal of Urology, 2002
- Predictive factors of successful testicular sperm recovery in non‐obstructive azoospermia patientsInternational Journal of Andrology, 2001
- Prospective comparative study between microsurgical and conventional testicular sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia: follow-up by serial ultrasound examinationsHuman Reproduction, 2000
- Testicular sperm extraction: microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excisionHuman Reproduction, 1999
- Microdissection TESE: sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoopsermia. VIDEOHuman Reproduction Update, 1998
- Are there any predictive factors for successful testicular sperm recovery in azoospermic patients?Human Reproduction, 1997
- Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyteThe Lancet, 1992