The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 22 May 2012
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 12 (1), 96
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-96
Abstract
Allied Health Professionals today are required, more than ever before, to demonstrate their impact. However, despite at least 20 years of expectation, many services fail to deliver routine outcome measurement in practice. This systematic review investigates what helps and hinders routine outcome measurement of allied health professionals practice.This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recent changes to the ethical review process is good news for psychologists and health researchers in Europe, especially in the UKEurope’s Journal of Psychology, 2012
- Evidence-Based Practice Depends on the Routine Use of Outcome MeasuresBritish Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2011
- Attitudes of mental health staff to routine outcome measurementJournal of Mental Health, 2009
- Factors Influencing the Use of Outcome Measures for Patients With Low Back Pain: A Survey of New Zealand Physical TherapistsPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 2008
- Use of Outcome Measures in Physiotherapy Practice in Ireland from 1998 to 2003 and Comparison to Canadian TrendsPhysiotherapy Canada, 2008
- Using thematic analysis in psychologyQualitative Research in Psychology, 2006
- Outcome Measures Used in Therapy Departments in ScotlandPhysiotherapy, 1996
- The Clinical Utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance MeasureCanadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1995
- NoticesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Outcomes ManagementThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1988