The Effect of Surgeon Volume on Outcomes and Resource Use for Vaginal Hysterectomy
- 1 December 2010
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 116 (6), 1341-1347
- https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e3181fca8c5
Abstract
To estimate the effect of surgical volume on outcomes and resource use in women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy. Women who underwent total vaginal hysterectomy and were registered in the Perspective database were examined. Perspective is a nationwide database developed to measure quality and resource use. Procedure-associated intraoperative, perioperative, and postoperative medical complications as well as hospital readmission, length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) use, operating time, and cost were analyzed. Based on the overall gynecologic surgical volume and vaginal surgical volume of their surgeons, patients were stratified into tertiles. Complications were compared using adjusted generalized estimating equations and reported as odds ratios (ORs). A total of 77,109 patients operated on by 6,195 gynecologic surgeons were identified. After adjustment for the effects of other demographic variables and concomitant procedures, patients operated on by high-volume vaginal surgeons were 31% (OR 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.80) less likely to experience an operative injury, whereas perioperative complications were reduced by 19% (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.72-0.92), medical complications decreased by 24% (OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.67-0.86), ICU admission reduced by 46% (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.43-0.73), and the transfusion rate decreased by 28% (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.61-0.85) in patients treated by high-volume vaginal surgeons, whereas rates of readmission were higher (OR 1.24; 95% CI 1.04-1.47) in patients treated by high-volume surgeons. Operative times were lower in patients operated on by high-volume surgeons (P<.001). Although total gynecologic surgical volume had no effect on cost, patients treated by high-volume vaginal surgeons had lower costs (P<.001). Perioperative morbidity and resource use are lower in women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy when the procedure is performed by high-volume vaginal surgeons.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nationwide Use of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Compared With Abdominal and Vaginal ApproachesObstetrics & Gynecology, 2009
- Outcome—more than just operative mortalityJournal of Surgical Oncology, 2009
- The Effect of Provider Case Volume on Cancer Mortality: Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2009
- Hysterectomy Rates in the United States, 2003Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2007
- Severe complications of hysterectomy: the VALUE studyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2004
- Surgeon Volume and Operative Mortality in the United StatesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United StatesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Variations in Morbidity after Radical ProstatectomyThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Morbidity of 10 110 hysterectomies by type of approachHuman Reproduction, 2001
- Influence of Hospital Procedure Volume on Outcomes Following Surgery for Colon CancerJAMA, 2000