The Effect of Provider Case Volume on Cancer Mortality: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- 1 May 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
- Vol. 59 (3), 192-211
- https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.20018
Abstract
The authors. systematically reviewed the association between provider case volume and mortality in 101 publications involving greater than 1 million patients with esophageal, gastric, hepatic, pancreatic, colon, or rectal case volume and short-term perioperative mortality. Few studies addressed surgeon case volume or evaluated long-term survival outcomes. Common methodologic limitations were failure to control for potential confounders, post hoc categorization of provider volume, and unit of analysis errors. A significant volume effect was evident for the majority of gastrointestinal cancers; with each doubling of hospital case volume, the odds of perioperative death decreased by 0.1 to 0.23. The authors calculated that between 10 and 50 patients per year, depending on cancer type, needed to be moved from a "low-volume" hospital to a "high-volume" hospital to prevent 1 additional volume-associated perioperative death. Despite this, approximately one-third of all analyses did not find a significant volume effect on mortality. The heterogeneity of results from individual studies calls into question the validity of case volume as a proxy for care quality, and leads the authors to conclude that more direct quality measures and the validity of their,use to inform policy should also be explored. CA Cancer J Clin 2009;59:192-211. (C) 2009 American Cancer Society, Inc.This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hospital volume does not influence long-term survival of patients undergoing surgery for oesophageal or gastric cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2007
- Volume and process of care in high‐risk cancer surgeryCancer, 2006
- Population-based study of risk factors for postoperative death after anterior resection of the rectumBritish Journal of Surgery, 2006
- Operative mortality after colorectal resection in the NetherlandsBritish Journal of Surgery, 2005
- The Case Against Volume as a Measure of Quality of Surgical CareWorld Journal of Surgery, 2005
- Provider volume and outcomes for oncological proceduresBritish Journal of Surgery, 2005
- Influence of volume and specialization on survival following surgery for colorectal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2004
- Surgeon volume compared to hospital volume as a predictor of outcome following primary colon cancer resectionJournal of Surgical Oncology, 2003
- Influence of specialization on the management and outcome of patients with pancreatic cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2003
- National estimates of mortality rates for radical pancreaticoduodenectomy in 25,000 patientsAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2002