The dual imperatives of action research
- 1 March 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Emerald in Information Technology & People
- Vol. 14 (1), 46-59
- https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840110384771
Abstract
Action research (AR) is not without its critics, and those who reject some of the paradigmatic assumptions embodied in AR maintain that AR is little more than consultancy, that it is impossible to establish causal relationships, that it is difficult to generalize from AR studies, that there is a risk of researcher bias, and that generally speaking, it lacks some of the key qualities that are normally associated with rigorous research. The authors are sensitive to such criticisms, for although they are committed action researchers, they have elsewhere voiced their concerns about the quality of AR practice in the field of information systems. The authors argue that part of the issue concerns the way in which we currently conceptualize AR. In this article, the argument for a deeper and more reflective analysis of the meaning and full implications of AR is developed, culminating in a model of AR being developed that explicitly includes both a problem solving interest cycle and a research interest cycle. Important implications of this new model are articulated, with examples to illustrate these points being drawn from a real‐life AR study.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diversity in information systems action research methodsEuropean Journal of Information Systems, 1998
- A Review on the Use of Action Research in Information Systems StudiesPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,1997
- A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems researchJournal of Information Technology, 1996
- Action Research and Information Systems ResearchPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,1995
- Emerging Varieties of Action Research: Introduction to the Special IssueHuman Relations, 1993
- Cognitive mappingEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 1988
- Defining System Requirements to meet Business Needs: a Case Study ExampleThe Computer Journal, 1985
- An assessment of the prototyping approach to information systems developmentCommunications of the ACM, 1984
- TOWARDS A DEFINITION OF ACTION RESEARCH: A NOTE AND BIBLIOGRAPHYJournal of Management Studies, 1980
- An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action ResearchAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1978