Periosteum, bone's “smart” bounding membrane, exhibits direction-dependent permeability
Open Access
- 27 September 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Vol. 28 (3), 608-617
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1777
Abstract
The periosteum serves as bone's bounding membrane, exhibits hallmarks of semipermeable epithelial barrier membranes, and contains mechanically sensitive progenitor cells capable of generating bone. The current paucity of data regarding the periosteum's permeability and bidirectional transport properties provided the impetus for the current study. In ovine femur and tibia samples, the periosteum's hydraulic permeability coefficient, k, was calculated using Darcy's Law and a custom-designed permeability tester to apply controlled, volumetric flow of phosphate-buffered saline through periosteum samples. Based on these data, ovine periosteum demonstrates mechanically responsive and directionally dependent (anisotropic) permeability properties. At baseline flow rates comparable to interstitial fluid flow (0.5 µL/s), permeability is low and does not exhibit anisotropy. In contrast, at high flow rates comparable to those prevailing during traumatic injury, femoral periosteum exhibits an order of magnitude higher permeability compared to baseline flow rates. In addition, at high flow rates permeability exhibits significant directional dependence, with permeability higher in the bone to muscle direction than vice versa. Furthermore, compared to periosteum in which the intrinsic tension (pre-stress) is maintained, free relaxation of the tibial periosteum after resection significantly increases its permeability in both flow directions. Hence, the structure and mechanical stress state of periosteum influences its role as bone's bounding membrane. During periods of homeostasis, periosteum may serve as a barrier membrane on the outer surface of bone, allowing for equal albeit low quiescent molecular communication between tissue compartments including bone and muscle. In contrast, increases in pressure and baseline flow rates within the periosteum resulting from injury, trauma, and/or disease may result in a significant increase in periosteum permeability and consequently in increased molecular communication between tissue compartments. Elucidation of the periosteum's permeability properties is key to understanding periosteal mechanobiology in bone health and healing, as well as to elucidate periosteum structure and function as a smart biomaterial that allows bidirectional and mechanically responsive fluid transport. © 2013 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Concise Review: The Periosteum: Tapping into a Reservoir of Clinically Useful Progenitor CellsStem Cells Translational Medicine, 2012
- Surgical Membranes as Directional Delivery Devices to Generate Tissue: Testing in an Ovine Critical Sized Defect ModelPLOS ONE, 2011
- Differential effects of claudin-3 and claudin-4 on alveolar epithelial barrier functionAmerican Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, 2011
- In situ permeability measurement of the mammalian lacunar–canalicular systemBone, 2010
- Lipids and Collagen Matrix Restrict the Hydraulic Permeability Within the Porous Compartment of Adult Cortical BoneAnnals of Biomedical Engineering, 2009
- Experimental Determination of the Permeability in the Lacunar-Canalicular Porosity of BoneJournal of Biomechanical Engineering, 2009
- The Periosteum as a Cellular Source for Functional Tissue EngineeringTissue Engineering, Part A, 2009
- Bone as an inspiration for a novel class of mechanoactive materialsBiomaterials, 2009
- Pairing computational and scaled physical models to determine permeability as a measure of cellular communication in micro- and nano-scale pericellular spacesMicrofluidics and Nanofluidics, 2007
- Effects of Nonlinear Strain-Dependent Permeability and Rate of Compression on the Stress Behavior of Articular CartilageJournal of Biomechanical Engineering, 1981