Surgical Membranes as Directional Delivery Devices to Generate Tissue: Testing in an Ovine Critical Sized Defect Model
Open Access
- 12 December 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 6 (12), e28702
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028702
Abstract
Pluripotent cells residing in the periosteum, a bi-layered membrane enveloping all bones, exhibit a remarkable regenerative capacity to fill in critical sized defects of the ovine femur within two weeks of treatment. Harnessing the regenerative power of the periosteum appears to be limited only by the amount of healthy periosteum available. Here we use a substitute periosteum, a delivery device cum implant, to test the hypothesis that directional delivery of endogenous periosteal factors enhances bone defect healing. Newly adapted surgical protocols were used to create critical sized, middiaphyseal femur defects in four groups of five skeletally mature Swiss alpine sheep. Each group was treated using a periosteum substitute for the controlled addition of periosteal factors including the presence of collagen in the periosteum (Group 1), periosteum derived cells (Group 2), and autogenic periosteal strips (Group 3). Control group animals were treated with an isotropic elastomer membrane alone. We hypothesized that periosteal substitute membranes incorporating the most periosteal factors would show superior defect infilling compared to substitute membranes integrating fewer factors (i.e. Group 3>Group 2>Group 1>Control). Based on micro-computed tomography data, bone defects enveloped by substitute periosteum enabling directional delivery of periosteal factors exhibit superior bony bridging compared to those sheathed with isotropic membrane controls (Group 3>Group 2>Group 1, Control). Quantitative histological analysis shows significantly increased de novo tissue generation with delivery of periosteal factors, compared to the substitute periosteum containing a collagen membrane alone (Group 1) as well as compared to the isotropic control membrane. Greatest tissue generation and maximal defect bridging was observed when autologous periosteal transplant strips were included in the periosteum substitute. Periosteum-derived cells as well as other factors intrinsic to periosteum play a key role for infilling of critical sized defects.This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of mechanical loading patterns, bone graft, and proximity to periosteum on bone defect healingJournal of Biomechanics, 2010
- Beam hardening artifacts in micro-computed tomography scanning can be reduced by X-ray beam filtration and the resulting images can be used to accurately measure BMDBone, 2009
- The Periosteum as a Cellular Source for Functional Tissue EngineeringTissue Engineering, Part A, 2009
- Skeletal Cell Fate Decisions Within Periosteum and Bone Marrow During Bone RegenerationJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2009
- A Perspective: Engineering Periosteum for Structural Bone Graft HealingClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2008
- The study of the feasibility of segmental bone defect repair with tissue- engineered bone membrane: a qualitative observationStrategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction, 2008
- Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegrationEuropean Spine Journal, 2001
- The Ilizarov fixator in trauma: a 10-year experienceJournal of Orthopaedic Science, 2000
- Problems, Obstacles, and Complications of Limb Lengthening by the Ilizarov TechniqueClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1990
- Osteoinduction in Undemineralized Bone Implants Modified by Chemical Inhibitors of Endogenous Matrix Enzymes A Preliminary ReportClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1972