Genetic adaptation to captivity can occur in a single generation
Top Cited Papers
- 19 December 2011
- journal article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 109 (1), 238-242
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1111073109
Abstract
Captive breeding programs are widely used for the conservation and restoration of threatened and endangered species. Nevertheless, captive-born individuals frequently have reduced fitness when reintroduced into the wild. The mechanism for these fitness declines has remained elusive, but hypotheses include environmental effects of captive rearing, inbreeding among close relatives, relaxed natural selection, and unintentional domestication selection (adaptation to captivity). We used a multigenerational pedigree analysis to demonstrate that domestication selection can explain the precipitous decline in fitness observed in hatchery steelhead released into the Hood River in Oregon. After returning from the ocean, wild-born and first-generation hatchery fish were used as broodstock in the hatchery, and their offspring were released into the wild as smolts. First-generation hatchery fish had nearly double the lifetime reproductive success (measured as the number of returning adult offspring) when spawned in captivity compared with wild fish spawned under identical conditions, which is a clear demonstration of adaptation to captivity. We also documented a tradeoff among the wild-born broodstock: Those with the greatest fitness in a captive environment produced offspring that performed the worst in the wild. Specifically, captive-born individuals with five (the median) or more returning siblings (i.e., offspring of successful broodstock) averaged 0.62 returning offspring in the wild, whereas captive-born individuals with less than five siblings averaged 2.05 returning offspring in the wild. These results demonstrate that a single generation in captivity can result in a substantial response to selection on traits that are beneficial in captivity but severely maladaptive in the wild.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Compromising genetic diversity in the wild: unmonitored large-scale release of plants and animalsTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2010
- Parentage in natural populations: novel methods to detect parent‐offspring pairs in large data setsMolecular Ecology Resources, 2009
- Admixture analysis of stocked brown trout populations using mapped microsatellite DNA markers: indigenous trout persist in introgressed populationsBiology Letters, 2009
- Value of captive populations for quantitative genetics researchTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2009
- How well can captive breeding programs conserve biodiversity? A review of salmonidsEvolutionary Applications, 2008
- Effects of a single event of close inbreeding on growth and survival in steelheadConservation Genetics, 2008
- The MHC and non-random mating in a captive population of Chinook salmonHeredity, 2008
- Genetic consequences of interbreeding between farmed and wild Atlantic salmon: insights from the transcriptomeMolecular Ecology, 2007
- Differences in juvenile phenotypes and survival between hatchery stocks and a natural population provide evidence for modified selection due to captive breedingCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 2004
- Statistical confidence for likelihood‐based paternity inference in natural populationsMolecular Ecology, 1998