Move Over Daniel
- 1 September 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Administration & Society
- Vol. 43 (6), 704-716
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711424569
Abstract
Professor Flinders makes a strong case that our obsession with accountability has turned “problematic” and even “pathological”. While agreeing with the gist of the argument, I contend that the essence of the problem is more ontological than political. What we require is a radical “reframing” that highlights the pervasive role accountability relationships play in governance— that is, an approach that would shift attention to the alteration of ongoing governance arrangements and relationships that occurs with each reformist effort to “enhance” or “improve” accountability. Governance takes place within accountability spaces, and we need to give priority to research that maps that space as a first step toward understanding the nature and potential of accountable governance.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- ‘It Feels Right in My Heart’: Affective Accountability in Narratives of AttachmentSociological Review, 2011
- "Doing with space": towards a pragmatics of spaceSocial Geography Discussions, 2009
- Impact of Competing Accountability Requirements on Perceived Work PerformanceThe American Review of Public Administration, 2009
- The accountability lens: A new way to view management issuesBusiness Horizons, 2007
- Negative affectivity as a moderator of the form and magnitude of the relationship between felt accountability and job tensionJournal of Organizational Behavior, 2005
- Contracting and Accountability in State Medicaid Reform: Rhetoric, Theories, and RealityPublic Administration Review, 1999
- Accounting for the effects of accountability.Psychological Bulletin, 1999
- Manifesto for a Relational SociologyAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1997
- The social space and the genesis of groupsTheory and Society, 1985
- Social Space in Interdisciplinary PerspectiveGeographical Review, 1969