Perceived quality of e‐health services
- 29 June 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Emerald in International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing
- Vol. 4 (2), 112-136
- https://doi.org/10.1108/17506121011059740
Abstract
Purpose: Health service quality is an important determinant for health service satisfaction and behavioral intentions. The purpose of this paper is to investigate requirements of e‐health services and to develop a measurement model to analyze the construct of “perceived e‐health service quality.”Design/methodology/approach: The paper adapts the C‐OAR‐SE procedure for scale development by Rossiter. The focal aspect is the “physician‐patient relationship” which forms the core dyad in the healthcare service provision. Several in‐depth interviews were conducted in Switzerland; first with six patients (as raters), followed by two experts of the healthcare system (as judges). Based on the results and an extensive literature research, the classification of object and attributes is developed for this model.Findings: The construct e‐health service quality can be described as an abstract formative object and is operationalized with 13 items: accessibility, competence, information, usability/user friendliness, security, system integration, trust, individualization, empathy, ethical conduct, degree of performance, reliability, and ability to respond.Research limitations/implications: Limitations include the number of interviews with patients and experts as well as critical issues associated with C‐OAR‐SE. More empirical research is needed to confirm the quality indicators of e‐health services.Practical implications: Health care providers can utilize the results for the evaluation of their service quality. Practitioners can use the hierarchical structure to measure service quality at different levels. The model provides a diagnostic tool to identify poor and/or excellent performance with regard to the e‐service delivery.Originality/value: The paper contributes to knowledge with regard to the measurement of e‐health quality and improves the understanding of how customers evaluate the quality of e‐health services.Keywords
This publication has 67 references indexed in Scilit:
- E‐healthcare: an analysis of key themes in researchInternational Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing, 2007
- The Predictive Validity of Multiple-Item versus Single-Item Measures of the Same ConstructsJournal of Marketing Research, 2007
- User-Centric Hospital Web Sites: A Case for Trust and Personalizatione-Service Journal, 2007
- Internet-Based Patient-Physician Electronic Communication Applications: Patient Acceptance and Truste-Service Journal, 2007
- The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing: a commentInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, 2005
- A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer ResearchJournal of Consumer Research, 2003
- The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketingInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, 2002
- What is e-health?Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2001
- Customers' Perceptions of Service Quality in Financial InstitutionsInternational Journal of Bank Marketing, 1988
- Quality of health care for the disadvantagedJournal of Community Health, 1975