The impact of accountability on motivational goals and the quality of advice provided in crisis negotiations.
- 1 May 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
- Vol. 19 (2), 137-150
- https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030629
Abstract
This study investigated the impact of accountability on motivation for self-preservation and the quality of advice provided by negotiator advisors in a simulated suicide intervention. Accountability was manipulated across five sequential developments by increasing risk to lives and level of involvement in terms of tailoring advice to the situation. Seventy-seven police officers acted as negotiator advisors and rated their own perceived levels of accountability and motivational priorities regarding saving lives or self-preservation (protecting self from negative evaluation) at each point. At early stages within the incident, accountability was at its lowest point and was positively correlated with motivation to save lives. At latter stages (after a fatality), accountability was significantly elevated and significantly positively correlated with motivation for self-preservation. Further, at latter stages of the incident, accountability was negatively correlated with effective discrimination between relevant and irrelevant information (measured against a "gold standard" conducted with a panel of expert negotiators in the absence of time pressure). Thus, as perceived accountability increased, effective discrimination decreased. Findings indicate that especially high levels of accountability may hinder performance by compromising advisors' effectiveness in discriminating between relevant and irrelevant information. This may be a function of accountability encouraging the use of cognitively complex strategies, leading to an increase in cognitive load. The practical and theoretical implications of this are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Acute Stress Modulates Risk Taking in Financial Decision MakingPsychological Science, 2009
- Motivated Information Processing in Group Judgment and Decision MakingPersonality and Social Psychology Review, 2007
- Political skill as neutralizer of felt accountability—job tension effects on job performance ratings: A longitudinal investigationOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2007
- An Episodic Process Model of Affective Influences on Performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2005
- Factors affecting the acceptance of expert adviceBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 2005
- Work Motivation Theory and Research at the Dawn of the Twenty-First CenturyAnnual Review of Psychology, 2005
- Integrative and Distributive Negotiation in Small Groups: Effects of Task Structure, Decision Rule, and Social MotiveOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2002
- Trust, Confidence, and Expertise in a Judge-Advisor SystemOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2001
- Accounting for the effects of accountability.Psychological Bulletin, 1999
- Threat Rigidity Effects in Organizational Behavior: A Multilevel AnalysisAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1981