How intangibility affects perceived risk: the moderating role of knowledge and involvement
- 1 April 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Emerald in Journal of Services Marketing
- Vol. 17 (2), 122-140
- https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040310467907
Abstract
The marketing literature suggests that product intangibility is positively associated with perceived risk and the intangibility construct encompasses three dimensions: physical intangibility, mental intangibility, and generality. The purpose of this research is to test which dimension of the intangibility construct is the most correlated with perceived risk. A survey was conducted and structural equation modeling analyses were used to test the proposed model. Results show that the mental dimension of intangibility accounts for more variance in the perceived risk construct than the other two dimensions, even when knowledge and involvement are included as moderators. Hence, the challenge for marketers might not be so much to reduce risk by physically tangibilizing goods and services, as has been advised for the past two decades, as rather to mentally tangibilize their offerings.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Three-Dimensional Scale of IntangibilityJournal of Service Research, 2001
- An Examination of the Perceptions of Organizational Politics Model: Replication and ExtensionHuman Relations, 1999
- Consumer Knowledge AssessmentJournal of Consumer Research, 1994
- Equivalence of constructs measured by job-specific and commercially available aptitude tests.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1992
- The Intangibility of Services: Measurement and Competitive PerspectivesJournal of Services Marketing, 1990
- Selection of Legal ServicesJournal of Professional Services Marketing, 1988
- The Role of Imagery in Information Processing: Review and ExtensionsJournal of Consumer Research, 1987
- Selection of legal services: An investigation of perceived riskServices Marketing Quarterly, 1987
- Perceived risk: The concept and its measurementPsychology & Marketing, 1986
- Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement ErrorJournal of Marketing Research, 1981