Essential Criteria to Characterize Constructivist Teaching: Derived from a review of the literature and applied to five constructivist‐teaching method articles
- 11 March 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in International Journal of Science Education
- Vol. 31 (4), 541-550
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701731121
Abstract
Constructivism is an important theory of learning that is used to guide the development of new teaching methods, particularly in science education. However, because it is a theory of learning and not of teaching, constructivism is often either misused or misunderstood. Here we describe the four essential features of constructivism: eliciting prior knowledge, creating cognitive dissonance, application of new knowledge with feedback, and reflection on learning. We then use the criteria we developed to evaluate five representative published articles that claim to describe and test constructivist teaching methods. Of these five articles, we demonstrate that three do not adhere to the constructivist criteria, whereas two provide strong examples of how constructivism can be employed as a teaching method. We suggest that application of the four essential criteria will be a useful tool for all professional educators who plan to implement or evaluate constructivist teaching methods.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Student-Centered Approach to Teaching General Biology That Really Works: Lord's Constructivist Model Put to a TestThe American Biology Teacher, 2003
- Teaching of biological inheritance and evolution of living beings in secondary schoolInternational Journal of Science Education, 2003
- The Accidental Constructivist: A Mathematician's DiscoveryCollege Teaching, 2002
- 101 Reasons for Using Cooperative Learning in Biology TeachingThe American Biology Teacher, 2001
- What is the relationship between social constructivism and Piagetian constructivism? An analysis of the characteristics of the ideas within both theoriesInternational Journal of Science Education, 2000
- Constructivism in School Science Education: Powerful Model or the Most Dangerous Intellectual Tendency?Science & Education, 2000
- A Comparison Between Traditional and Constructivist Teaching in Environmental ScienceThe Journal of Environmental Education, 1999
- Cooperative Learning That Really Works in Biology Teaching: Using Constructivist-Based Activities to Challenge Student TeamsThe American Biology Teacher, 1998
- Constructivism in Mass Higher Education: a Case StudyBritish Journal of Educational Technology, 1998
- A comparison between traditional and constructivist teaching in college biologyInnovative Higher Education, 1997