A Comparison Between Traditional and Constructivist Teaching in Environmental Science
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in The Journal of Environmental Education
- Vol. 30 (3), 22-27
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00958969909601874
Abstract
Two instructional methods (teacher centered and student centered) were compared in a non-laboratory-based environmental science course for college undergraduates. Students in 2 teacher-centered (traditional) classes (n = 46 and n = 45) were presented material in standard lecture fashion for 90 min twice a week. Students in 2 student-centered (constructivist) classes (n = 48 and n = 42) worked in small, heterogeneous groups on thought-provoking scenarios and critical thinking questions or constructed concept maps on the information of the day; material was presented to the students in question-discussion fashion. Identical materials, learning resources, student questionnaires, and examinations were used for both populations. Students in constructivist classes performed significantly better on exams, rated the course higher, and participated more in campus and regional environmental support efforts than students in traditional classes.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Editorial. The many forms of constructivismJournal of Research in Science Teaching, 1993
- In the name of constructivism: Science education research and the construction of local knowledgeJournal of Research in Science Teaching, 1993
- Reinterpreting the learning cycle from a social constructivist perspective: A qualitative study of teachers' beliefs and practicesJournal of Research in Science Teaching, 1993
- Using constructivist ideas to teach science teachers about constructivist ideas, or teachers are students too!Journal of Science Teacher Education, 1992