Experience with revascularization procedures does matter: low volume means worse outcome
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 5 June 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Heart Journal
- Vol. 31 (16), 1954-1957
- https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq172
Abstract
This editorial refers to ‘The relation between volume and outcome of coronary interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis’†, by P.N. Post et al., on page 1985Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- The relation between volume and outcome of coronary interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysisEuropean Heart Journal, 2010
- Is Hospital Procedure Volume a Reliable Marker of Quality for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery? A Comparison of Risk and Propensity Adjusted Operative and Midterm OutcomesThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2005
- Is the Impact of Hospital and Surgeon Volumes on the In-Hospital Mortality Rate for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Limited to Patients at High Risk?Circulation, 2004
- Procedural Volume as a Marker of Quality for CABG SurgeryJAMA, 2004
- Do Hospitals and Surgeons With Higher Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Volumes Still Have Lower Risk-Adjusted Mortality Rates?Circulation, 2003
- Is Volume Related to Outcome in Health Care? A Systematic Review and Methodologic Critique of the LiteratureAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2002
- Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Selective Referral to High-Volume HospitalsJAMA, 2000
- Volume-outcome relationships in cardiovascular operations: New York state, 1990-1995The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1999
- Should Operations Be Regionalized?New England Journal of Medicine, 1979