Is Hospital Procedure Volume a Reliable Marker of Quality for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery? A Comparison of Risk and Propensity Adjusted Operative and Midterm Outcomes
- 30 June 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 79 (6), 1961-1969
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.12.002
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is the Impact of Hospital and Surgeon Volumes on the In-Hospital Mortality Rate for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Limited to Patients at High Risk?Circulation, 2004
- Procedural Volume as a Marker of Quality for CABG SurgeryJAMA, 2004
- Do Hospitals and Surgeons With Higher Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Volumes Still Have Lower Risk-Adjusted Mortality Rates?Circulation, 2003
- Should Volume Standards for Cardiovascular Surgery Focus Only on High-Risk Patients?Circulation, 2003
- Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Invited commentary: Quality of care and the volume-outcome relationship—What's next for surgery?Surgery, 2002
- Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: Potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiativeSurgery, 2001
- The decline in coronary artery bypass graft surgery mortality in New York State. The role of surgeon volumePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995
- Investigation of the relationship between volume and mortality for surgical procedures performed in New York State hospitalsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1989
- Association of volume with outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Scheduled vs nonscheduled operationsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1987