Perceptions of distributive and procedural justice in employee benefits: flexible versus traditional benefit plans
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- Published by Emerald in Journal of Managerial Psychology
- Vol. 19 (1), 19-40
- https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940410520646
Abstract
The self‐interest and relational models of organizational justice were tested to explain the relationship between benefit plan type and organizational justice. Benefit plan types considered were flexible and traditional plans. In support of the self‐interest model employees in flexible benefit plans had significantly higher perceptions of procedural justice than employees in traditional benefit plans. There were no significant differences in perceptions of distributive justice between the plan types.Keywords
This publication has 79 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effects of Distributive and Procedural Justice on PerformanceThe Journal of Psychology, 1999
- Effects of training in procedural justice on perceptions of disciplinary fairness by unionized employees and disciplinary subject matter experts.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1997
- Increasing citizenship behavior within a labor union: A test of organizational justice theory.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1996
- Case Study: How Pitney Bowes Broadens Benefit Choices With Value-Added ServicesCompensation & Benefits Review, 1996
- Beyond the Tax CodeCompensation & Benefits Review, 1995
- Workers′ Evaluations of the "Ends" and the "Means": An Examination of Four Models of Distributive and Procedural JusticeOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1993
- Exchange Ideology as a Moderator of the Procedural Justice-Satisfaction RelationshipThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1993
- THE IMPACT OF FLEXIBLE BENEFITS ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION: A FIELD STUDYPersonnel Psychology, 1992
- BENEFIT COVERAGE AND EMPLOYEE COST: CRITICAL FACTORS IN EXPLAINING COMPENSATION SATISFACTIONPersonnel Psychology, 1988
- The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behaviorSocial Justice Research, 1987