Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes to Improve the Predictive Accuracy of Clinician-Reported Adverse Events
Open Access
- 7 December 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 103 (24), 1808-1810
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djr493
Abstract
Abundant research has now demonstrated that patient and clinician reports of symptoms—and particularly symptomatic toxicities (ie, adverse events) during cancer treatment—provide discrepant yet complementary data ( 1–3 ).This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patient Self-Reports of Symptoms and Clinician Ratings as Predictors of Overall Cancer SurvivalJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2011
- Adverse Symptom Event Reporting by Patients vs Clinicians: Relationships With Clinical OutcomesJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2009
- NCCTG Study N9741: Leveraging Learning from an NCI Cooperative Group Phase III TrialThe Oncologist, 2009
- The Limitations of Risk Factors as Prognostic ToolsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Assessing health-related quality of life in palliative care: Comparing patient and physician assessmentsEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2006
- How Accurate Is Clinician Reporting of Chemotherapy Adverse Effects? A Comparison With Patient-Reported Symptoms From the Quality-of-Life Questionnaire C30Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2004