Covariate adjustment in randomized controlled trials with dichotomous outcomes increases statistical power and reduces sample size requirements
- 31 May 2004
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 57 (5), 454-460
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.09.014
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lessons Learned From Recent Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: Part ICirculation, 2002
- Reporting on methods of subgroup analysis in clinical trials: a survey of four scientific journalsBrazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 2001
- The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trialsThe Lancet, 2001
- Subgroups, treatment effects, and baseline risks: Some lessons from major cardiovascular trialsAmerican Heart Journal, 2000
- Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trialsThe Lancet, 2000
- Randomised controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine: past achievements, future challengesBMJ, 1999
- Understanding controlled trials: Baseline imbalance in randomised controlled trialsBMJ, 1999
- Should We Adjust for Covariates in Nonlinear Regression Analyses of Randomized Trials?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1998
- Can overall results of clinical trials be applied to all patients?The Lancet, 1995
- Testing for baseline balance in clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1994