Should We Adjust for Covariates in Nonlinear Regression Analyses of Randomized Trials?
- 30 June 1998
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Controlled Clinical Trials
- Vol. 19 (3), 249-256
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0197-2456(97)00147-5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Loss in Efficiency Caused by Omitting Covariates and Misspecifying Exposure in Logistic Regression ModelsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1993
- A consequence of omitted covariates when estimating odds ratiosJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991
- Some Surprising Results about Covariate Adjustment in Logistic Regression ModelsInternational Statistical Review, 1991
- A quantitative study of the bias in estimating the treatment effect caused by omitting a balanced covariate in survival modelsStatistics in Medicine, 1988
- The Effect of Pooling Across Strata in Perfectly Balanced StudiesPublished by JSTOR ,1988
- Tests for no treatment effect in randomized clinical trialsBiometrika, 1988
- The impact of heterogeneity on the comparison of survival timesStatistics in Medicine, 1987
- Misspecified proportional hazard modelsBiometrika, 1986
- Small Sample Properties of the Likelihood Estimator in Proportional Hazard Regression Models with Omitted VariablesBiometrical Journal, 1986
- Biased estimates of treatment effect in randomized experiments with nonlinear regressions and omitted covariatesBiometrika, 1984