The RAND Continuous 2012 Presidential Election Poll
- 19 June 2014
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Public Opinion Quarterly
- Vol. 78 (S1), 233-254
- https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu009
Abstract
The RAND Continuous 2012 Presidential Election Poll (CPEP) was conducted within the American Life Panel, an Internet panel recruited through traditional probability sampling to ensure representativeness. Because the CPEP asks the same respondents repeatedly about their voting preferences, observed changes are attributable primarily to individuals changing their minds and not to random sampling fluctuations. The CPEP asks respondents to state in terms of percent chance both their preferences for a candidate and the likelihood that they will vote. Moreover, we asked the respondents about their actual voting after the election, so we can study the predictive power both within sample and out of sample (the national results). The CPEP appears to have predicted well. Our final prediction of the difference in popular vote between Obama and Romney differed about half a percentage point from the final tally, which would place it near or at the top of the polling firms. The probabilistic questions, even months before the election, were strongly related to actual voting behavior. Our approach allows us to gain insights into stability of voting preferences and the effect of events on individual preferences; for example, various shifts can be clearly related to major events.This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validation: What Big Data Reveal About Survey Misreporting and the Real ElectoratePolitical Analysis, 2012
- Probabilistic Polling And Voting In The 2008 Presidential ElectionPublic Opinion Quarterly, 2010
- National Surveys Via Rdd Telephone Interviewing Versus the InternetPublic Opinion Quarterly, 2009
- Computing Response Metrics for Online PanelsPublic Opinion Quarterly, 2008
- Noncoverage and nonresponse in an Internet surveySocial Science Research, 2005
- Comparing Data from Online and Face-to-face SurveysInternational Journal of Market Research, 2005
- Likely (and Unlikely) Voters and the Assessment of Campaign DynamicsPublic Opinion Quarterly, 2004
- Reducing Vote Overreporting in Surveys: Social Desirability, Memory Failure, and Source MonitoringPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1999
- Deterministic and Probabilistic Voting ModelsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1997
- Predicting the Likelihood to Vote in Pre-Election PollsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 1991