Probabilistic Polling And Voting In The 2008 Presidential Election
- 13 May 2010
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Public Opinion Quarterly
- Vol. 74 (3), 433-459
- https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq019
Abstract
This article reports new empirical evidence on probabilistic polling, which asks persons to state in percent-chance terms the likelihood that they will vote and for whom. Before the 2008 presidential election, seven waves of probabilistic questions were administered biweekly to participants in the American Life Panel (ALP). Actual voting behavior was reported after the election. We find that responses to the verbal and probabilistic questions are well-aligned ordinally. Moreover, the probabilistic responses predict voting behavior beyond what is possible using verbal responses alone. The probabilistic responses have more predictive power in early August, and the verbal responses have more power in late October. However, throughout the sample period, one can predict voting behavior better using both types of responses than either one alone. Studying the longitudinal pattern of responses, we segment respondents into those who are consistently pro-Obama, consistently anti-Obama, and undecided/vacillators. Membership in the consistently pro- or anti-Obama group is an almost perfect predictor of actual voting behavior, while the undecided/vacillators group has more nuanced voting behavior. We find that treating the ALP as a panel improves predictive power: current and previous polling responses together provide more predictive power than do current responses alone.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring subjective expectations in developing countries: A critical review and new evidenceJournal of Development Economics, 2011
- Eliciting Subjective Probabilities in Internet SurveysPublic Opinion Quarterly, 2008
- Expected Equity Returns and Portfolio Choice: Evidence from the Health and Retirement StudyJournal of the European Economic Association, 2007
- Likely (and Unlikely) Voters and the Assessment of Campaign DynamicsPublic Opinion Quarterly, 2004
- How Should We Measure Consumer Confidence?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2004
- Teen Expectations for Significant Life EventsPublic Opinion Quarterly, 2000
- Deterministic and Probabilistic Voting ModelsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1997
- Using Expectations Data to Study Subjective Income ExpectationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1997
- Perceptions of Economic Insecurity: Evidence From the Survey of Economic ExpectationsPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1997
- A New Methods of Predicting Voting BehaviourMarket Research Society Journal, 1993