The Effect of Model Approximations on Single-Collision Distributions of Low-Energy Electrons in Liquid Water
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Radiation Research Society in Radiation Research
- Vol. 163 (1), 98-111
- https://doi.org/10.1667/rr3281
Abstract
Emfietzoglou, D. and Nikjoo, H. The Effect of Model Approximations on Single-Collision Distributions of Low-Energy Electrons in Liquid Water. Radiat. Res. 163, 98–111 (2005).The development of cross sections for the inelastic interaction of low-energy electrons with condensed tissue-like media is best accomplished within the framework of the dielectric theory. In this work we investigate the degree to which various model approximations, used in the above methodology, influence electron single-collision distributions. These distributions are of major importance to Monte Carlo track structure codes, namely, the energy-loss spectrum, the inelastic inverse mean free path, and the ionization efficiency. In particular, we make quantitative assessment of the influence of (1) the optical data set, (2) the dispersion algorithm, and (3) the perturbation and exchange Born corrections. It is shown that, although the shape and position of the energy-loss spectrum remains almost fixed, its peak height may vary by up to a factor of 1.5. Discrepancies in the calculated inelastic inverse mean free path are largely within 20–30% above 100 eV; they increase drastically, though, at lower energies. Exchange and perturbation Born corrections increase gradually below 1 keV leading to a ∼30 to 40% reduction of the inverse mean free path at 100 eV. The perturbation effect contributes more than the exchange effect to this reduction. Similar to the dispersion situation, the effect of Born corrections at lower energies is also unclear since the models examined disagree strongly below 100 eV. In comparison, the vapor data are higher than the liquid calculations by 20 to 50% as the energy decreases from 1 to 0.1 keV, respectively. The excitation contribution is the main cause of this difference, since the ionization efficiency in the liquid levels off at ∼90%, whereas the plateau value for the vapor is ∼70%. It is concluded that electron inelastic distributions for liquid water, although in some respects distinctively different from the vapor phase, have associated uncertainties that are comparable in magnitude to the phase differences. The situation below 100 eV is uncertain.This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analysis of Low-Energy Electron Track Structure in Liquid WaterRadiation Research, 2004
- The complete optical spectrum of liquid water measured by inelastic x-ray scatteringProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2000
- Monte Carlo simulation of the inelastic scattering of electrons and positrons using optical-data modelsRadiation Physics and Chemistry, 1998
- Track structure in radiation biology: theory and applicationsInternational Journal of Radiation Biology, 1998
- Comparison of Energy Deposition in Small Cylindrical Volumes by Electrons Generated by Monte Carlo Track Structure Codes for Gaseous and Liquid WaterRadiation Protection Dosimetry, 1994
- Track structure analysis illustrating the prominent role of low-energy electrons in radiobiological effects of low-LET radiationsPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 1991
- Effect of phase on the stopping and range distribution of low-energy electrons in waterThe Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1986
- Calculated yields and fluctuations for electron degradation in liquid water and water vaporThe Journal of Chemical Physics, 1986
- Comparative Study of Electron Energy Deposition and Yields in Water in the Liquid and Vapor PhasesRadiation Research, 1982
- Platzman's Analysis of the Delivery of Radiation Energy to MoleculesRadiation Research, 1975