Engaging Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) clinical staff to lead practice improvement: the PICU Participatory Action Research Project (PICU-PAR)
Open Access
- 8 January 2014
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Implementation Science
- Vol. 9 (1), 6
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-6
Abstract
Despite considerable efforts, engaging staff to lead quality improvement activities in practice settings is a persistent challenge. At British Columbia Children's Hospital (BCCH), the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) undertook a new phase of quality improvement actions based on the Community of Practice (CoP) model with Participatory Action Research (PAR). This approach aims to mobilize the PICU 'community' as a whole with a focus on practice; namely, to create a 'community of practice' to support reflection, learning, and innovation in everyday work. An iterative two-stage PAR process using mixed methods has been developed among the PICU CoP to describe the environment (stage 1) and implement specific interventions (stage 2). Stage 1 is ethnographic description of the unit's care practice. Surveys, interviews, focus groups, and direct observations describe the clinical staff's experiences and perspectives around bedside care and quality endeavors in the PICU. Contrasts and comparisons across participants, time and activities help understanding the PICU culture and experience. Stage 2 is a succession of PAR spirals, using results from phase 1 to set up specific interventions aimed at building the staff's capability to conduct QI projects while acquiring appropriate technical skills and leadership capacity (primary outcome). Team communication, information, and interaction will be enhanced through a knowledge exchange (KE) and a wireless network of iPADs. Lack of leadership at the staff level in order to improve daily practice is a recognized challenge that faces many hospitals. We believe that the PAR approach within a highly motivated CoP is a sound method to create the social dynamic and cultural context within which clinical teams can grow, reflect, innovate and feel proud to better serve patients.This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- Designing an implementation strategy to improve interprofessional shared decision making in sciatica: study protocol of the DISC studyImplementation Science, 2012
- Video Elicitation Interviews: A Qualitative Research Method for Investigating Physician-Patient InteractionsAnnals of Family Medicine, 2012
- Learning and Caring in Communities of Practice: Using Relationships and Collective Learning to Improve Primary Care for Patients with MultimorbidityAnnals of Family Medicine, 2010
- Use of communities of practice in business and health care sectors: A systematic reviewImplementation Science, 2009
- On the trail of quality and safety in health careBMJ, 2008
- Visualizing Personal Networks: Working with Participant-aided SociogramsField Methods, 2007
- How Many Interviews Are Enough?Field Methods, 2006
- Toward Evidence-Based Quality Improvement.Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2006
- Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study IQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2004
- What is participatory research?Social Science & Medicine (1982), 1995