Designing an implementation strategy to improve interprofessional shared decision making in sciatica: study protocol of the DISC study
Open Access
- 15 June 2012
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Implementation Science
- Vol. 7 (1), 55
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-55
Abstract
Background Sciatica is a common condition worldwide that is characterized by radiating leg pain and regularly caused by a herniated disc with nerve root compression. Sciatica patients with persisting leg pain after six to eight weeks were found to have similar clinical outcomes and associated costs after prolonged conservative treatment or surgery at one year follow-up. Guidelines recommend that the team of professionals involved in sciatica care and patients jointly decide about treatment options, so-called interprofessional shared decision making (SDM). However, there are strong indications that SDM for sciatica patients is not integrated in daily practice. We designed a study aiming to explore the barriers and facilitators associated with the everyday embedding of SDM for sciatica patients. All related relevant professionals and patients are involved to develop a tailored strategy to implement SDM for sciatica patients. Methods The study consists of two phases: identification of barriers and facilitators and development of an implementation strategy. First, barriers and facilitators are explored using semi-structured interviews among eight professionals of each (para)medical discipline involved in sciatica care (general practitioners, physical therapists, neurologists, neurosurgeons, and orthopedic surgeons). In addition, three focus groups will be conducted among patients. Second, the identified barriers and facilitators will be ranked using a questionnaire among a representative Dutch sample of 200 GPs, 200 physical therapists, 200 neurologists, all 124 neurosurgeons, 200 orthopedic surgeons, and 100 patients. A tailored team-based implementation strategy will be developed based on the results of the first phase using the principles of intervention mapping and an expert panel. Discussion Little is known about effective strategies to increase the uptake of SDM. Most implementation strategies only target a single discipline, whereas multiple disciplines are involved in SDM among sciatica patients. The results of this study can be used as an example for implementing SDM in other patient groups receiving multidisciplinary complex care (e.g., elderly) and can be generalized to other countries with similar context, thereby contributing to a worldwide increase of SDM in preference sensitive choices.This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Surgery versus conservative management of sciatica due to a lumbar herniated disc: a systematic reviewEuropean Spine Journal, 2010
- Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionalsPublished by Wiley ,2009
- Dual equipoise shared decision making: definitions for decision and behaviour support interventionsImplementation Science, 2009
- Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: Update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptionsPatient Education and Counseling, 2008
- Arduous implementation: Does the Normalisation Process Model explain why it's so difficult to embed decision support technologies for patients in routine clinical practiceImplementation Science, 2008
- Patient Preferences and Expectations for CareSpine, 2008
- Prolonged conservative care versus early surgery in patients with sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation: two year results of a randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2008
- Prolonged conservative care versus early surgery in patients with sciatica from lumbar disc herniation: cost utility analysis alongside a randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2008
- Diagnosis and treatment of sciaticaBMJ, 2007
- Toward Evidence-Based Quality Improvement.Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2006