PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts
Open Access
- 9 April 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Medicine
- Vol. 10 (4), e1001419
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001419
Abstract
Elaine Beller and colleagues from the PRISMA for Abstracts group provide a reporting guidelines for reporting abstracts of systematic reviews in journals and at conferences.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistencyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- Establishing a Minimum Dataset for Prospective Registration of Systematic Reviews: An International ConsultationPLOS ONE, 2011
- The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trialsBMJ, 2011
- Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?PLoS Medicine, 2010
- The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and ElaborationPLoS Medicine, 2009
- Understanding PubMed(R) user search behavior through log analysisDatabase: The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation, 2009
- CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and ElaborationPLoS Medicine, 2008
- Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic reviewBMJ, 2006
- Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical surveyBMJ, 2004
- Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2004