Controlled ovarian stimulation and progesterone supplementation affect vaginal and endometrial microbiota in IVF cycles: a pilot study
Open Access
- 15 July 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
- Vol. 37 (9), 2315-2326
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01878-4
Abstract
Purpose Does controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and progesterone (P) luteal supplementation modify the vaginal and endometrial microbiota of women undergoing in vitro fertilization? Methods Fifteen women underwent microbiota analysis at two time points: during a mock transfer performed in the luteal phase of the cycle preceding COS, and at the time of fresh embryo transfer (ET). A vaginal swab and the distal extremity of the ET catheter tip were analyzed using next-generation 16SrRNA gene sequencing. Heterogeneity of the bacterial microbiota was assessed according to both the Bray-Curtis similarity index and the Shannon diversity index. Results Lactobacillus was the most prevalent genus in the vaginal samples, although its relative proportion was reduced by COS plus P supplementation (71.5 ± 40.6% vs. 61.1 ± 44.2%). In the vagina, an increase in pathogenic species was observed, involving Prevotella (3.5 ± 8.9% vs. 12.0 ± 19.4%), and Escherichia coli-Shigella spp. (1.4 ± 5.6% vs. 2.0 ± 7.8%). In the endometrium, the proportion of Lactobacilli slightly decreased (27.4 ± 34.5% vs. 25.0 ± 29.9%); differently, both Prevotella and Atopobium increased (3.4 ± 9.5% vs. 4.7 ± 7.4% and 0.7 ± 1.5% vs. 5.8 ± 12.0%). In both sites, biodiversity was greater after COS (p < 0.05), particularly in the endometrial microbiota, as confirmed by Bray-Curtis analysis of the phylogenetic distance among bacteria genera. Bray-Curtis analysis confirmed significant differences also for the paired endometrium-vagina samples at each time point. Conclusions Our findings suggest that COS and P supplementation significantly change the composition of vaginal and endometrial microbiota. The greater instability could affect both endometrial receptivity and placentation. If our findings are confirmed, they may provide a further reason to encourage the freeze-all strategy.Keywords
Funding Information
- This research was funded with resources from the University of Turin. No external funds have been received.
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Deciphering the effect of reproductive tract microbiota on human reproductionReproductive Medicine and Biology, 2018
- Analysis of endometrial microbiota by 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing among infertile patients: a single‐center pilot studyReproductive Medicine and Biology, 2018
- Evidence that the endometrial microbiota has an effect on implantation success or failureAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2016
- IntroductionFertility and Sterility, 2015
- Potential Influence of the Microbiome on Infertility and Assisted Reproductive TechnologySeminars in Reproductive Medicine, 2014
- Microorganisms within Human Follicular Fluid: Effects on IVFPLOS ONE, 2013
- Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age womenProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010
- Then and now: use of 16S rDNA gene sequencing for bacterial identification and discovery of novel bacteria in clinical microbiology laboratoriesClinical Microbiology & Infection, 2008
- The Human Microbiome ProjectNature, 2007
- Microbes on the human vaginal epitheliumProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005