Comparison of self-report versus accelerometer – measured physical activity and sedentary behaviors and their association with body composition in Latin American countries
Open Access
- 28 April 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 15 (4), e0232420
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232420
Abstract
Most population-based studies from Latin America have used questionnaires to measure physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviors (SB). Low reliability and validity of the questionnaires has limited the capacity to examine associations between PA and health. The purpose of this study was to compare self-reported and accelerometer–measured PA and SB and their associations with body composition in Latin American countries. Data were obtained from the Latin American Study of Nutrition and Health (aged 15–65 years), collected from September 2014 to February 2015. PA and SB were assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (long version) and the Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometer. Outcomes of interest included: body mass index (BMI), waist (WC) and neck circumference (NC). We used the Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman plots, and multilevel linear regression models. Mean moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) by accelerometer and IPAQ were 34.4 min/day (95% CI: 33.4 to 35.4) and 45.6 min/day (95% CI: 43.2 to 48.1), respectively. For SB (accelerometer and IPAQ) the means were 573.1 (95% CI: 568.2 to 577.9) and 231.9 min/day (95% CI: 225.5 to 238.3). MVPA, measured by the accelerometer was negatively associated with BMI (β = -1.95; 95% CI: -2.83 to -1.08), WC (β = -5.04; 95% CI: -7.18 to -2.89) and NC (β = -1.21; 95% CI: -1.79 to -0.63). The MVPA estimated through IPAQ was not significantly associated with any of the three outcome variables. SB, measured by the accelerometer, was positively associated with BMI (β = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.44) and WC (β = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.91). SB estimated through IPAQ was positively associated with NC only. Low correlation coefficients were observed for accelerometer-derived and IPAQ-reported estimates of PA and SB. Caution is advised when making comparisons between accelerometer-measured and self-reported PA and SB. Further, studies examining associations between movement and health should discuss the impact of PA and SB measurement methodology on the results obtained.Funding Information
- Coca-Cola Foundation
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Letter to the Editor: Standardized use of the terms “sedentary” and “sedentary behaviours”Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 2012
- Sedentary time in relation to cardio-metabolic risk factors: differential associations for self-report vs accelerometry in working age adultsInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2012
- Objective vs. Self-Reported Physical Activity and Sedentary Time: Effects of Measurement Method on Relationships with Risk BiomarkersPLOS ONE, 2012
- Direct and indirect measurement of physical activity in older adults: a systematic review of the literatureInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2012
- Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): A systematic reviewInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2011
- The Descriptive Epidemiology of Sitting: A 20-Country Comparison Using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2011
- Measurement of Adults' Sedentary Time in Population-Based StudiesAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2011
- What proportion of youth are physically active? Measurement issues, levels and recent time trendsBritish Journal of Sports Medicine, 2011
- Comparison of Accelerometer Cut Points for Predicting Activity Intensity in YouthMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2011
- Physical Activity in the United States Measured by AccelerometerMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2008