Comparison of Accelerometer Cut Points for Predicting Activity Intensity in Youth
Top Cited Papers
- 1 July 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Vol. 43 (7), 1360-1368
- https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e318206476e
Abstract
The absence of comparative validity studies has prevented researchers from reaching consensus regarding the application of intensity-related accelerometer cut points for children and adolescents. This study aimed to evaluate the classification accuracy of five sets of independently developed ActiGraph cut points using energy expenditure, measured by indirect calorimetry, as a criterion reference standard. A total of 206 participants between the ages of 5 and 15 yr completed 12 standardized activity trials. Trials consisted of sedentary activities (lying down, writing, computer game), lifestyle activities (sweeping, laundry, throw and catch, aerobics, basketball), and ambulatory activities (comfortable walk, brisk walk, brisk treadmill walk, running). During each trial, participants wore an ActiGraph GT1M, and V˙O2 was measured breath-by-breath using the Oxycon Mobile portable metabolic system. Physical activity intensity was estimated using five independently developed cut points: Freedson/Trost (FT), Puyau (PU), Treuth (TR), Mattocks (MT), and Evenson (EV). Classification accuracy was evaluated via weighted κ statistics and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC). Across all four intensity levels, the EV (κ=0.68) and FT (κ=0.66) cut points exhibited significantly better agreement than TR (κ=0.62), MT (κ=0.54), and PU (κ=0.36). The EV and FT cut points exhibited significantly better classification accuracy for moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity (ROC-AUC=0.90) than TR, PU, or MT cut points (ROC-AUC=0.77-0.85). Only the EV cut points provided acceptable classification accuracy for all four levels of physical activity intensity and performed well among children of all ages. The widely applied sedentary cut point of 100 counts per minute exhibited excellent classification accuracy (ROC-AUC=0.90). On the basis of these findings, we recommend that researchers use the EV ActiGraph cut points to estimate time spent in sedentary, light-, moderate-, and vigorous-intensity activity in children and adolescents.This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Epoch Length and Accelerometer Outputs in ChildrenMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2008
- Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for childrenJournal of Sports Sciences, 2008
- Amount of Time Spent in Sedentary Behaviors in the United States, 2003-2004American Journal of Epidemiology, 2008
- Development of a Compendium of Energy Expenditures for Youth.International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2008
- Decision boundaries and receiver operating characteristic curves: New methods for determining accelerometer cutpointsJournal of Sports Sciences, 2007
- Calibration of an accelerometer during free-living activities in childrenPediatric Obesity, 2007
- Physical Activities in Adolescent Girls: Variability in Energy ExpenditureAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2006
- Energy Costs of Physical Activities in Children and AdolescentsMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2005
- Validation and Calibration of Physical Activity Monitors in ChildrenObesity Research, 2002
- Basic principles of ROC analysisSeminars in Nuclear Medicine, 1978