Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): A systematic review
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 21 October 2011
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
- Vol. 8 (1), 115
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-115
Abstract
Background: The International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ-SF) has been recommended as a cost-effective method to assess physical activity. Several studies validating the IPAQ-SF have been conducted with differing results, but no systematic review of these studies has been reported. Methods: The keywords "IPAQ", "validation", and "validity" were searched in PubMed and Scopus. Studies published in English that validated the IPAQ-SF against an objective physical activity measuring device, doubly labeled water, or an objective fitness measure were included. Results: Twenty-three validation studies were included in this review. There was a great deal of variability in the methods used across studies, but the results were largely similar. Correlations between the total physical activity level measured by the IPAQ-SF and objective standards ranged from 0.09 to 0.39; none reached the minimal acceptable standard in the literature (0.50 for objective activity measuring devices, 0.40 for fitness measures). Correlations between sections of the IPAQ-SF for vigorous activity or moderate activity level/walking and an objective standard showed even greater variability (-0.18 to 0.76), yet several reached the minimal acceptable standard. Only six studies provided comparisons between physical activity levels derived from the IPAQ-SF and those obtained from objective criterion. In most studies the IPAQ-SF overestimated physical activity level by 36 to 173 percent; one study underestimated by 28 percent. Conclusions: The correlation between the IPAQ-SF and objective measures of activity or fitness in the large majority of studies was lower than the acceptable standard. Furthermore, the IPAQ-SF typically overestimated physical activity as measured by objective criterion by an average of 84 percent. Hence, the evidence to support the use of the IPAQ-SF as an indicator of relative or absolute physical activity is weak.Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Physical Activity Questionnaires for YouthSports Medicine, 2010
- Physical Activity Questionnaires for AdultsSports Medicine, 2010
- Self-Administered Physical Activity Questionnaires for the ElderlySports Medicine, 2010
- Sedentary Behaviors Increase Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Mortality in MenMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2010
- Clinical assessment of the physical activity pattern of chronic fatigue syndrome patients: a validation of three methodsHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2009
- Validation of the New Zealand Physical Activity Questionnaire (NZPAQ-LF) and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-LF) with accelerometryBritish Journal of Sports Medicine, 2008
- Reliability and validity of the international physical activity questionnaire in the Nord-Trøndelag health study (HUNT) population of menBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2008
- Reliability and validity of two frequently used self-administered physical activity questionnaires in adolescentsBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2008
- Validity of two physical activity questionnaires (IPAQ and PAQA) for Vietnamese adolescents in rural and urban areasInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2008
- Validity and Reliability of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire in College StudentsAmerican Journal of Health Education, 2006