Factors shaping the implementation and use of Clinical Cancer Decision Tools by GPs in primary care: a qualitative framework synthesis
Open Access
- 19 February 2021
- Vol. 11 (2), e043338
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043338
Abstract
Objective Clinical Cancer Decision Tools (CCDTs) aim to alert general practitioners (GPs) to signs and symptoms of cancer, supporting prompt investigation and onward referral. CCDTs are available in primary care in the UK but are not widely utilised. Qualitative research has highlighted the complexities and mechanisms surrounding their implementation and use; this has focused on specific cancer types, formats, systems or settings. This study aims to synthesise qualitative data of GPs’ attitudes to and experience with a range of CCDTs to gain better understanding of the factors shaping their implementation and use. Design A systematic search of the published (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science and EMBASE) and grey literature (July 2020). Following screening, selection and assessment of suitability, the data were analysed and synthesised using normalisation process theory. Results Six studies (2011 to 2019), exploring the views of GPs were included for analysis. Studies focused on the use of several different types of CCDTs (Risk Assessment Tools (RAT) or electronic version of RAT (eRAT), QCancer and the 7-point checklist). GPs agreed CCDTs were useful to increase awareness of signs and symptoms of undiagnosed cancer. They had concerns about the impact on trust in their own clinical acumen, whether secondary care clinicians would consider referrals generated by CCDT as valid and whether integration of the CCDTs within existing systems was achievable. Conclusions CCDTs might be a helpful adjunct to clinical work in primary care, but without careful development to legitimise their use GPs are likely to give precedence to clinical acumen and gut instinct. Stakeholder consultation with secondary care clinicians and consideration of how the CCDTs fit into a GP consultation are crucial to successful uptake. The role and responsibilities of a GP as a clinician, gatekeeper, health promoter and resource manager affect the interaction with and implementation of innovations such as CCDTs.Keywords
Funding Information
- Health Education England North East (N/A)
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using the 7-point checklist as a diagnostic aid for pigmented skin lesions in general practice: a diagnostic validation studyBritish Journal of General Practice, 2013
- Should we appraise the quality of qualitative research reports for systematic reviews, and if so, how?Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 2013
- Now I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative researchQualitative Research, 2013
- Evaluation of risk assessment tools for suspected cancer in general practice: a cohort studyBritish Journal of General Practice, 2013
- Effect of adding a diagnostic aid to best practice to manage suspicious pigmented lesions in primary care: randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2012
- Communicating riskBMJ, 2012
- Communicating risk to patients and the publicBritish Journal of General Practice, 2012
- Perceived barriers to guideline adherence: A survey among general practitionersBMC Family Practice, 2011
- Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventionsBMC Medicine, 2010
- What if cancer survival in Britain were the same as in Europe: how many deaths are avoidable?British Journal of Cancer, 2009