The Historical Significance of Joe Camel
- 1 September 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Marketing & Public Policy
- Vol. 19 (2), 168-182
- https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.19.2.168.17132
Abstract
The Joe Camel advertising campaigns had little or no effect on smoking by youths or adults beyond shifting brand shares among younger smokers. The advertisements appear to have wielded substantial influence on the larger political and legal environment, however. This influence was transmitted first through the lens of pronouncements by the public health community, including the Food and Drug Administration, which helped shape public opinion toward the view that cigarette advertising causes smoking. This, in turn, provided essential support for the unprecedented wave of litigation that engulfed the industry and has relied primarily on nonpublic industry documents rather than market data. The extent of Joe Camel's indirect influence has not been quantified but appears to have been substantial.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tobacco litigation worldwideBMJ, 2000
- Trust? No---verifyTobacco Control, 1999
- An assessment of US and Canadian smoking reduction objectives for the year 2000.American Journal of Public Health, 1998
- The Legal and Scientific Basis for FDA's Assertion of Jurisdiction Over Cigarettes and Smokeless TobaccoJAMA, 1997
- The Food and Drug Administration's Regulation of Tobacco ProductsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Nicotine Addiction in Young PeopleNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Ethical Advertising Research Standards: Three Case StudiesJournal of Advertising, 1994
- U.S. cigarette demand, 1961–1990: Econometric issues, evidence, and implicationsJournal of Business Research, 1994
- RJR Nabisco's Cartoon Camel Promotes Camel Cigarettes to ChildrenJAMA, 1991
- An Empirical Analysis of Dynamic, Nonprice Competition in an Oligopolistic IndustryThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1988