Improving data quality control in quality improvement projects
Open Access
- 13 February 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in International Journal for Quality in Health Care
- Vol. 21 (2), 145-150
- https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzp005
Abstract
The results of many quality improvement (QI) projects are gaining wide-spread attention. Policy-makers, hospital leaders and clinicians make important decisions based on the assumption that QI project results are accurate. However, compared with clinical research, QI projects are typically conducted with substantially fewer resources, potentially impacting data quality. Our objective was to provide a primer on basic data quality control methods appropriate for QI efforts. Data quality control methods should be applied throughout all phases of a QI project. In the design phase, project aims should guide data collection decisions, emphasizing quality (rather than quantity) of data and considering resource limitations. In the data collection phase, standardized data collection forms, comprehensive staff training and a well-designed database can help maximize the quality of the data. Clearly defined data elements, quality assurance reviews of both collection and entry and system-based controls reduce the likelihood of error. In the data management phase, missing data should be quickly identified and corrected with system-based controls to minimize the missing data. Finally, in the data analysis phase, appropriate statistical methods and sensitivity analysis aid in managing and understanding the effects of missing data and outliers, in addressing potential confounders and in conveying the precision of results. Data quality control is essential to ensure the integrity of results from QI projects. Feasible methods are available and important to help ensure that stakeholder's decisions are based on accurate data.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of quality improvement collaborativesBMJ, 2008
- Public Reporting and Pay for Performance in Hospital Quality ImprovementNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- An Intervention to Decrease Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in the ICUNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Team-Based Prevention of Catheter-Related InfectionsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Creating High Reliability in Health Care OrganizationsHealth Services Research, 2006
- The Unintended Consequences of Publicly Reporting Quality InformationJAMA, 2005
- Eliminating catheter-related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit*Critical Care Medicine, 2004
- Number-Between g-Type Statistical Quality Control Charts for Monitoring Adverse EventsHealth Care Management Science, 2001
- A Framework for Collaborative ImprovementQuality Management in Health Care, 1998
- Quality control: an application of the cusum.BMJ, 1992