Melanoma and Tumor Thickness
Open Access
- 1 March 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Dermatology
- Vol. 135 (3), 269-274
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.135.3.269
Abstract
THE MOST accurate prognostic factor of primary melanoma has been shown to be the thickness of the lesion according to Breslow.1,2 Campaigns for early diagnosis are based on the hypothesis that the tumor thickness is the consequence of the delay in the diagnosis, ie, patients' delay in seeking medical attention and physicians' delay in the detection of early melanoma. Information campaigns that increase population awareness about melanoma, training of physicians, and screening are expected to shorten these delays. Indeed, a decrease in Breslow thickness was observed in many countries where early detection was promoted.3-6This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cutaneous malignant melanoma. Publicity, screening clinics and survival-the Edinburgh experience 1982-90British Journal of Dermatology, 1995
- Cancer Research Campaign health education programme to promote the early detection of cutaneous malignant melanoma. II. Characteristics and incidence of melanomaBritish Journal of Dermatology, 1995
- Audit of public education campaign to encourage earlier detection of malignant melanoma.BMJ, 1992
- Delay in the diagnosis of cutaneous malignant melanoma. A prospective study in 250 patientsCancer, 1991
- The relationship of psychosocial factors to prognostic indicators in cutaneous malignant melanomaJournal of Psychosomatic Research, 1985
- Factors related to patient delay in seeking medical attention for cutaneous malignant melanomaCancer, 1984
- Relationship between patients' early recognition of melanoma and depth of invasionCancer, 1982
- Thickness, Cross-Sectional Areas and Depth of Invasion in the Prognosis of Cutaneous MelanomaAnnals of Surgery, 1970