A critical examination of arguments against bicycle helmet use and legislation
- 1 March 2006
- journal article
- comment
- Published by Elsevier BV in Accident Analysis & Prevention
- Vol. 38 (2), 277-278
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2005.09.004
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Cochrane Collaboration and bicycle helmetsAccident Analysis & Prevention, 2005
- Trends in serious head injuries among English cyclists and pedestriansInjury Prevention, 2003
- Risk compensation theory and voluntary helmet use by cyclists in SpainInjury Prevention, 2003
- Impact of Mandatory Helmet Legislation on Bicycle-Related Head Injuries in Children: A Population-Based StudyPEDIATRICS, 2002
- Mandatory helmet legislation and children's exposure to cyclingInjury Prevention, 2001
- Bicycle helmet efficacy: a meta-analysisAccident Analysis & Prevention, 2001
- Head injuries to bicyclists and the New Zealand bicycle helmet lawAccident Analysis & Prevention, 2000
- Head injuries and bicycle helmet lawsAccident Analysis & Prevention, 1996
- Mandatory bicycle helmet use following a decade of helmet promotion in Victoria, Australia—An evaluationAccident Analysis & Prevention, 1994
- A Prospective Analysis of Injury Severity Among Helmeted and Nonhelmeted Bicyclists Involved in Collisions with Motor VehiclesThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 1991