Why inconsistent leadership is regarded as procedurally unfair: the importance of social self‐esteem concerns
- 11 July 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Social Psychology
- Vol. 33 (4), 535-550
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.162
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Respect and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: The Importance of Feeling IncludedPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2002
- Self-esteem and outcome fairness: Differential importance of procedural and outcome considerations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001
- Procedures: Do we really want to know them? An examination of the effects of procedural justice on self-esteem.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000
- The moderating effect of self-esteem in reaction to voice: Converging evidence from five studies.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998
- Endorsement of distributively fair and unfair leaders in interpersonal and intergroup situationsEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 1997
- Does Having a Say Matter Only if You Get Your Way? INstrumental and Value-Expressive Effects of Employee VoiceBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 1996
- Fairness in groups: Comparing the self-interest and social identity perspectivesPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1993
- Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1986
- Procedural justice as a criterion in allocation decisions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986
- Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality.Psychological Review, 1973